Jerba wroteColonCy- keep in mind he had a lot of this already written. We are really pleased with what you have done so far! More is better around here, there is no need for a comparison.
Jerba wroteColonFox's reasoning makes sense to me because those rolls are determined by 2D10 rather than 1D20 and thus leads to certain combinations being rolled more often, right? If it was 1D20 the existing table seems to make more sense. In my mind I am picturing the rolling scheme of Settlers of Catan where 2D6 are rolled, the numbers 7, 6, 8 are the most commonly rolled because they have the most combinations of numbers that equal them. 2D10s would act the same way with 8-12 wouldn't it?
Users browsing this forum: 2 and 0 guests